SHADOWDANCERS DIGITAL PRESS

RIGHTS OF A SMALL BUSINESS

Criminal labor unions described under Oklahoma Constitution Article XXIII-1A, as we encountered in VERIO / NTT activity in Dallas Texas at INFOMART, have no rights to compel or coerce the sale of property in neighboring states to their foreign owner (32.6%, NATION OF JAPAN).

While this makes perfect sense to most business owners, even where kidnapping or child abuse are concerned, some of the public just do not get it unless told by CNN or MSNBC.

To be very plain, the equity of a business does not obligate anything to anyone who is not a lawful party in equity membership or securities to that business. The very idea that you may kidnap a child so you may overcome the owner of a business, is a felony violation themed "THE HOBBS ACT", and a crime.

While many states allow looting and riots in 2020 to avoid upsetting those very people burning down the industry of the United States and private persons; we see what the 2001-2020 fraud in 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a) embezzlement of benefits construes in the "Petersen v ALLEN" extortion case to overcome "BEYOND WAR" and "STRYX" marks.

Foreign businesses, confident in the message of groups like "BLACK LIVES MATTER", with no regard for the legal proxy actions of criminal terrorism and to their own benefit both for "protection" implied and "advantage", are wrecking the United States intellectual property market - both in literary rights and software - in a manner many theme 'piracy' authorized by a Laize Faire attitude of taking unless state government stops the practice.

While legitimate businesses still respect the boundaries of other scientific and academic developers, on the International scale we are seeing a complete collapse of the BERNE CONVENTION and criminal enterprise develop among Saudi Arabia, Japan, China, India, Sweden, Iceland, and other 'radical socialist' states; whereby taking from American business is considered sporting similar to piracy by ship in the 1500s-1700s.

Where no national military force will act and where civil authorities claim no jurisdiction, small business must defend itself, its family members, property of both, and the very public from fraud so themed 76 O.S. § 76-1 "inherent rights" violations, and § 76-3 "deceit" of the public, especially where the premeditated purpose of such deceit is irreparable harm and transfer of patents, franchise rights, and the extermination of the original authors to profit the looters - simlar to AXIS looting of Europe prior the invation of Europe by American and Russian forces.

These people appear to be AXIS-eugenics sympathizers, revitalized by oil and technology securities speculation, to justify the same taking that occurred out of jealousy in the 1930s and prior taking in effort to assert national identity over ordinary law in 1911.

The failure to instruct people in the consequence of such actions, or the completely loss of all privacy to limit the immediate and felony injury so specified a damage in 76 O.S. § 76-4 and 76-6 (civil death to a person in fraudulent use of mass communication technology) and 76-8 (child abduction) is upon us all again in 2020.

A business therefore has the right to resist (76 O.S. § 76-9) these abuses, and to resist felony abuse of mass communication to deceive the public (22 O.S. § 22-31), and requires no leave or order of the court; nor may it be so enjoined when in threat of its life and property in illegal taking, to discontinue such lawful defense as is a human right in First law.

All 'Secondary Law" such as statutory or regulatory or Federal laws made by the Legislatures of any state or nation, are not authoritative in concert with this injury to murder and disable a small party by a larger captial party solely for the gains therein available to the interested parties of that larger capital party. To disbar this is to suggest force is law, and no other protection; and to abandon all law in civil procedure in favor of unrestricted open war.

The larger parties are playing the victim and ignorant in this - leveraging their ability to buy media and influence courts and states. This is not a defense against the claim, nor the antitrust claim inherent in such abuse of the access to the court and disablement of persons rights based on purchase of the justice system and effort to engage in malicious and premeditated spoliation (23 O.S. § 23-9.1); and such claims to the contrary human trafficking (22 U.S.c. Chapter 78; 21 O.S. § 21-748.1) and criminal activity subject civil suit without requirement for indictment or conviction a pre-requisite to action (21 O.S. § 21-748.2; 15 U.S.C. § 1692d).

The very violation of the rule, regardless of the doer or the competency or the intent, is the merit upon which civil relief is obligated; and suspending such civil relief is extraordinary "all necessary force" authorized and well registered in 1907 treaty with the United States, for which the legal government may not relent and is inseperable from these terms (Oklahoma Constitution, Artcle I section I-1); and itself subject dissolution or suspension or modification on demand for violation (Article II section II-1); and such obligation and remedy not set to statutory limits for those firms and persons injured (Article II section II-6) or to suspend its legal right to public notice in action (Article II section II-3 and II-22).

Those nations who support a form of censorship based on their intrest or sugest libel a charge where matters in report are TRUE and for GOOD CAUSE made public; are enemy nations of the United States; and any government - including the UNITED STATES as legal person in incorporation or its franchise commission of any state government therefore made; are not beyond the designation of enemy of the United States and its lawful incorporators, members, and stakeholders designated there in the bylaws; disbarring any act or convention not made public and general knowledge in disclosure to the members including any themed bankruptcy or other debt or collateral not afforded the rule of the incorportion, which stands.

The government has not authority to surrender the nation, for it was in its rights only a steward of the incorporated limited powers, not a sovereign in such authority (Article II section II-1, Constitution of the State of Oklahoma; a Treaty with United States so made in 1907).

All theory of law not predicated on this is rebellion, insurrenction, and sedition against the Laws of the United States so made.

- James Allen, for Witherspoon (John) - incorporator of the United States (1776)